× Search rightsnet
Search options

Where

Benefit

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

From

to

Forum Home  →  Discussion  →  Decision making and appeals  →  Thread

DWP decides not to run project to test digital mandatory reconsiderations process in PIP

Stuart
Administrator

rightsnet editor

Send message

Total Posts: 890

Joined: 21 March 2016

The response to an FOI request published to whatdotheyknow.com yesterday provides details of proposals to run a ‘Modernisation of Disputes’ project last year focusing on PIP mandatory reconsideration.

A scoping document explains -

The Modernisation of Dissatisfaction supports the Departmental strategic objective of delivering excellent services for citizens and taxpayers by
- becoming more sustainable and resilient by increasing automation, intelligent use of data and joining up systems
- using customer insight to better tailor services, targeting our intervention where and when they can have most impact
The vision is to create a modern and transformed Dissatisfaction Service developed in line with customers’ needs, which builds and sustains trust through fair and consistent treatment across all products and services and all customers, partners and the taxpayer.

However, in a DWP digital blog about the project, the Department concludes that digitalising the mandatory reconsiderations service in PIP could be more of a hindrance than a help at the moment. However, they add that -

Our alpha work highlighted that our agents are using systems that aren’t fit for purpose when dealing with mandatory reconsiderations and appeals. For appeals especially, we saw some key areas where we can improve the user experience for our agents.
We have already started to look at this and identify where we can add value. We know that anything we can do to improve processes for agents will ultimately help citizens too.

 

[ Edited: 20 Jul 2022 at 12:04 pm by Stuart ]
Paul Stockton
forum member

Epping Forest CAB

Send message

Total Posts: 292

Joined: 6 May 2014

A “Dissatisfaction Service”!

You really couldn’t make it up.

Ianb
forum member

Macmillan benefits team, Citizens Advice Bristol

Send message

Total Posts: 958

Joined: 24 November 2017

And what is “alpha work” when it’s at home!

I also note “For appeals especially, we saw some key areas where we can improve the user experience for our agents.” Let’s home that might also result in improving the user experience for claimants.

Mike Hughes
forum member

Senior welfare rights officer - Salford City Council Welfare Rights Service

Send message

Total Posts: 3138

Joined: 17 June 2010

Ianb - 20 July 2022 05:38 PM

And what is “alpha work” when it’s at home!

I also note “For appeals especially, we saw some key areas where we can improve the user experience for our agents.” Let’s home that might also result in improving the user experience for claimants.

Everything you ever wanted to know about “alpha work”.

https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/how-the-alpha-phase-works

Ianb
forum member

Macmillan benefits team, Citizens Advice Bristol

Send message

Total Posts: 958

Joined: 24 November 2017

Mike Hughes - 21 July 2022 09:59 AM
Ianb - 20 July 2022 05:38 PM

And what is “alpha work” when it’s at home!

Everything you ever wanted to know about “alpha work”.

https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/how-the-alpha-phase-works

Skim reading that, it’s a complete collection of gobbledygook. It appears to have been written by somebody who does a day job for a satirical magazine,

But thanks for posting!

[ Edited: 21 Jul 2022 at 05:22 pm by Ianb ]
Mike Hughes
forum member

Senior welfare rights officer - Salford City Council Welfare Rights Service

Send message

Total Posts: 3138

Joined: 17 June 2010

If you work in IT, especially in business analysis, then it makes a lot of sense. You go alpha, beta and then public. However, there are an awful lot of alarm bells ringing around what they’re suggesting here. In particular more use of automation in respect of disputes is something to be raised with those already expressing concern on the lack of transparency on such issues.