New York Times tries to polish pro-Sharia Jew-hater Linda Sarsour’s image after AFDI #CancelSarsour protest

38

[the_ad id=”90513″]

Linda Sarsour is a pro-Sharia Jew-hater; that means the New York Times loves her.

Comments interspersed below.

Story continues below advertisement

“A Muslim-American Activist’s Speech Raises Ire Even Before It’s Delivered,” by Eli Rosenberg, New York Times, May 26, 2017:

Linda Sarsour, one of the most prominent Muslim-American activists in New York, says the messages have been arriving by the hour recently.

“Your time is coming.”

“A good Arab is a dead Arab.”

“You’re getting two bullets in your head.”

She “says” she has been receiving threats. This is news as far as the New York Times is concerned, although “journalist” Eli Rosenberg apparently doesn’t make any attempt to verify her claim. Meanwhile, Pamela Geller is the target of a fatwa from the Islamic State (ISIS). The Times, when it speaks about her, never leads with that information. Apparently, some death threats are just fine with the New York Times, if their targets are the Times’ ideological enemies.

Ms. Sarsour, one of the lead organizers of the Women’s March on Washington, has tackled issues like immigration policy, mass incarceration, stop-and-frisk and the New York Police Department’s spying operation on Muslims — all of which have largely inured her to hate-tinged criticism.

Note that everything the Times list shows her to be working actively to impede and obstruct counterterror efforts. The New York City of Sarsour’s dreams is supine and defenseless before the advancing jihad.

But it is the commencement address she is to deliver next week to about 100 students at the City University of New York School of Public Health that she says has drawn the most hostility and ire she has ever experienced.

“Linda Sarsour is a Sharia-loving, terrorist-embracing, Jew-hating, ticking time bomb of progressive horror,” the conservative media personality Milo Yiannopoulos said at a rally on Thursday outside CUNY’s main office, as protesters held signs with images associated with the often racist and anti-Semitic language used by what is known as the alt-right, a far-right, white nationalist movement.

Note that the Times makes no attempt to determine whether or not Milo’s charges are true (they are). It just quickly changes the subject to signs “with images associated with the often racist and anti-Semitic language used by what is known as the alt-right.” Associated by whom? Why, by the New York Times, of course. This paragraph is tantamount to saying, “Milo made some charges against Sarsour, but protesters were holding signs bearing images that we have previously smeared as racist.”

The controversy over Ms. Sarsour’s appearance is the latest dispute in a heated national dialogue over free speech on university campuses.

But in this instance, the roles have been reversed. Other protests have largely pitted left-wing students against conservative speakers like Mr. Yiannopoulos, Ann Coulter, Gavin McInnes and Charles Murray. This time, conservatives are leading the charge against Ms. Sarsour.

This is false. The controversy is not over her appearance at CUNY. We who are routinely barred from speaking on college campuses, or shouted down by fascists when we do, would never dream of saying she should not allowed to speak. In fact, I would be happy to go to CUNY at my own expense to debate her. The controversy is over whether she should be celebrated and lionized, given the honor of delivering the commencement address, in light of her numerous hateful, anti-Semitic, and pro-Sharia statements.

Her critics are a strange mix, including right-leaning Jews and Zionists, commentators like Pamela Geller, and some members of the alt-right.

They accuse her of sympathizing with terrorists, supporting Sharia law and anti-Semitism for statements she has made about politics in the Middle East.

And with good reason, although the Times never presents this evidence or bothers to debunk it.

The CUNY chancellor, James B. Milliken, has defended the appearance on the basis of free speech, and a group of CUNY professors, some prominent progressives and liberal Jewish groups have spoken in her support.

Free speech? Funny how universities seldom remember that principle when a conservative speaker comes around.

Fred Smith Jr., a constitutional scholar and assistant professor at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, said the controversy was a reminder of the bipartisan nature of the outcry over free-speech issues.

“There are a few people who have been very effective in branding the left at shutting down free speech, but the moment they are confronted with leftist speech they don’t like, they are equally outraged and poised to suppress that speech,” he said. “I don’t think that’s the answer for either side. The more you try to suppress speech, the more the ideas of the suppressed speaker become salient to more people. It makes the person more well known and attracts more people to those ideas.”

Once again, this is off the point, and an apparently deliberate obfuscation. The controversy is not over whether or not she can speak. It is over whether or not she should be the commencement speaker.

The debate about Ms. Sarsour’s speech began last month with Dov Hikind, a conservative Democratic state assemblyman who represents a largely Orthodox community in Brooklyn. Mr. Hikind said Ms. Sarsour should not have been chosen, pointing to her recent appearance in Chicago with Rasmea Odeh, who was convicted in Israel of playing a role in the bombing of a supermarket that killed two civilians in 1969.

Mr. Hikind also pointed to a picture Ms. Sarsour once posted on Twitter of a Palestinian boy standing across from police officers with rocks in his hands. Ms. Sarsour wrote that the photo was “The definition of courage.”

Mr. Hikind said in a phone interview, “You can’t support a terrorist and then be the commencement speaker at a university that my taxes help pay for.”

Indeed. And there is no doubt that her speech will be a pep rally of anti-Israel, anti-American agitprop, with heavy helpings of self-righteousness and self-pity.

….Brad Lander, a Democratic city councilman from Brooklyn, described the accusations against Ms. Sarsour as “preposterous,” and pointed to her help in raising money to repair two Jewish cemeteries that were vandalized in St. Louis and Pennsylvania in February.

“She’s been in my synagogue,” he said. “She and my rabbi are friends. There’s no doubt that part of what this is is backlash against the idea of having a Palestinian-American as a visible leader and inheritor of the civil rights movement.”

He added, “One terrible feature of the Trump regime is that it threatens to tribalize all of us.”

The fact that she repaired these cemeteries does not negate her pro-Sharia or viciously anti-Israel statements. She even declared recently that feminists could not support Israel. Lander is taking an incident that was an obvious bid to wrongfoot her opponents as a reversal of her entire stance regarding Israel. It wasn’t.

At the protest, even Mr. Yiannopoulos briefly acknowledged Ms. Sarsour’s right to speak, before making a racially tinged joke about her getting paid in goats. He was more restrained in an emailed response to a question.

“Unlike some of the other speakers, I don’t want Sarsour canceled,” he wrote. “I want as many people as possible to hear her odious thoughts. That doesn’t mean I can’t explain why she is dangerous and wrong.”

Once again: the problem is that she is the commencement speaker. She should be canceled as the commencement speaker. And brought back to debate with Pamela Geller or some other defender of freedom.

Ms. Sarsour said she had nothing to apologize about for her views.

She said there were questions about the integrity of Ms. Odeh’s conviction many decades ago. The photo of the Palestinian boy was taken during a week when about 200 Palestinians had been killed, she said. And she said she had never planned to speak about Israel in the commencement address.

We’ll see about that. In any case, note how the Times gives Sarsour space to rebut the charges, and never bothers to check on her claims about Odeh’s conviction or the photo. The Times never offers this service to those who aren’t Leftists.

Ms. Sarsour said she believed she became a target for far-right conservatives in the days after the Women’s March, which she said was evidence of a larger “Islamophobia industry.”

The claim that there is a well-heeled “Islamophobia industry” churning out hateful material against Muslims is a staple of Leftist propaganda. Ironically, the organizations such as the Center for American Progress and others that have produced lavishly printed “Islamophobia” reports have budgets exponentially larger than those of the organizations they defame as “Islamophobic.” If there is any “industry” here, it is that of the truly well-heeled effort to defame and destroy those who oppose jihad terror and Sharia oppression.

She has hired two private bodyguards to accompany her to public events. She says she regrets that she has not been able to shield her three children, all teenagers, from the vitriol and threats she has received online. Still, she said, she does not plan to be silent.

“I’m Muslim, I’m Palestinian, I’m a woman in a hijab,” she said. “I’m everything they stand against.”

She added, “I have a bigger mission here.”

In reality, she is a foe of counterterror efforts, a supporter of the jihad against Israel, and a woman who normalizes and legitimizes the Sharia oppression of women. Indeed, everything we stand against.

The Truth Must be Told

Your contribution supports independent journalism

Please take a moment to consider this. Now, more than ever, people are reading Geller Report for news they won't get anywhere else. But advertising revenues have all but disappeared. Google Adsense is the online advertising monopoly and they have banned us. Social media giants like Facebook and Twitter have blocked and shadow-banned our accounts. But we won't put up a paywall. Because never has the free world needed independent journalism more.

Everyone who reads our reporting knows the Geller Report covers the news the media won't. We cannot do our ground-breaking report without your support. We must continue to report on the global jihad and the left's war on freedom. Our readers’ contributions make that possible.

Geller Report's independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our work is critical in the fight for freedom and because it is your fight, too.

Please contribute here.

or

Make a monthly commitment to support The Geller Report – choose the option that suits you best.

Quick note: We cannot do this without your support. Fact. Our work is made possible by you and only you. We receive no grants, government handouts, or major funding. Tech giants are shutting us down. You know this. Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Adsense, Pinterest permanently banned us. Facebook, Google search et al have shadow-banned, suspended and deleted us from your news feeds. They are disappearing us. But we are here.

Subscribe to Geller Report newsletter here— it’s free and it’s essential NOW when informed decision making and opinion is essential to America's survival. Share our posts on your social channels and with your email contacts. Fight the great fight.

Follow Pamela Geller on Gettr. I am there. click here.

Follow Pamela Geller on
Trump's social media platform, Truth Social. It's open and free.

Remember, YOU make the work possible. If you can, please contribute to Geller Report.

Join The Conversation. Leave a Comment.

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spammy or unhelpful, click the - symbol under the comment to let us know. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

If you would like to join the conversation, but don't have an account, you can sign up for one right here.

If you are having problems leaving a comment, it's likely because you are using an ad blocker, something that break ads, of course, but also breaks the comments section of our site. If you are using an ad blocker, and would like to share your thoughts, please disable your ad blocker. We look forward to seeing your comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
38 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hussars2016
Hussars2016
6 years ago

NYT wants to kill us just as bad as the Islamists.

Suresh
Suresh
6 years ago
Reply to  Hussars2016

Agree. Its like all rights and freedom are to be given to Muslims and non-muslims do not have any rights as dhimmis ! And Left/liberal pro-jihadi loons allow it !

Infidels do not even have right to protest against crimes committed by Muslims . If they dare try it they get harassed, jailed or killed .

In fact Theresa May is furious with Trump for leaking Manchester jihadi attack photos to public http://bit.ly/2r6F3cp

It can’t get more ridiculous and dangerous.

Hussars2016
Hussars2016
6 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

It can’t , but it will.

Ari
Ari
6 years ago
Reply to  Suresh

Exactly. The newspaper (NYT) disseminates propaganda, as this article proves.
An Al Jazeera TV news presenter in the picture.
comment image

Steve
Steve
6 years ago
Reply to  Hussars2016

The more people it kills from critically thinking the easier it can print its version of the news.

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
6 years ago

comment image

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago

Well, that’s not accurate….everybodys pants are still on

Steve
Steve
6 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

There’s an eerie similarity here with the liberals mindlessly clinging to a notion that most people eventually realize as – well, fantasy. That of course is the myth we all know to be santa claus. The liberals, however, have turned believing in good st. nick into believing in not so good muslamists who –
despite all reality knocking at the door – even when its blown up – see it as delivery of “goodies”.

Post note – Despite all evidence I still hold true to believing that santa claus does arrive at Christmas!

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Steve

Santa’s not coming to kill you……

Steve
Steve
6 years ago
Reply to  santashandler

Exactly. The libs still don’t see the connection. I looked at the CUNY video and many of the libs look really pissed. Maybe seeing reality is just going to have to be painful for them – if they ever awaken.

santashandler
santashandler
6 years ago
Reply to  Steve

No. Probably won’t happen

lato_sensu
lato_sensu
6 years ago

mile-or-more birds

Jerry Dobson
Jerry Dobson
6 years ago

The New York Times is America’s enemy

Steve
Steve
6 years ago
Reply to  Jerry Dobson

And this time “Klaatu barada nikto” is not going to be enough to stop “gort”.

Mahou Shoujo
Mahou Shoujo
6 years ago

“….Brad Lander, a Democratic city councilman from Brooklyn, described the accusations against Ms. Sarsour as “preposterous,” and pointed to her help in raising money to repair two Jewish cemeteries that were vandalized in St. Louis and Pennsylvania in February”. What was her contribution? Conducting repairs to allow for more Jews to be buried? Installing tip over grave stones so vandals did not injure themselves when destroying tombstones?

Halal Bacon
Halal Bacon
6 years ago

happy ramadamadingdong 🙂

¯¯̿̿¯̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿’̿̿̿̿̿’̿̿̿)͇̿̿)̿̿̿̿ ‘̵͇̿̿̿̿̿̿̿̿=(•̪̀●́)=o/̵͇̿̿/’̿̿ ̿ ̿̿

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago
Reply to  Halal Bacon

Agreed. Try one of these: ?

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago
Reply to  Halal Bacon

I had sent you an emoji of a handgun but the censors took it down.

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
6 years ago

comment image

Steve
Steve
6 years ago

Little doctor muffet
She sat on her tuffet,
Sharpening knives one day
Along came a little girl
That knife slashed awhirl
And cut all her genitals away

Emmett
Emmett
6 years ago

wALTER dURANTY proved that the only job the n y slimes can do is pollish TURDS !!!!

hannah
hannah
6 years ago

Please write the editor at [email protected]. This is the second time they whitewash a terror supporter. The first time enough people called they had to retract the article. Also please email the chancellor of CUNY at [email protected] and call his office. Time is of the essence. The commencement is June 1st. It’s nice to be aware of the news and just get angry, but PLEASE TAKE ACTION.

mathewsjw
mathewsjw
6 years ago

it’s impossible to polish a Turd… at least according to my mom

Janet
Janet
6 years ago

The NY Times is a liberal praising bunch of propaganda for the left! I want to see them fail so bad and go out of business. They are totally biased and full of BS and so is that cow Sarsour!

Drew the Infidel
Drew the Infidel
6 years ago

You can’t make chicken salad out of chicken sh*t.

Lou
Lou
6 years ago

NYT trying to paint a human face on an Islamist robot.
And dehumanize the patriots who speak the truth.

Oracle9
Oracle9
6 years ago

Patronizes Sharia, just as the Left now openly does.

AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
AR154U☑ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ DEPLORABLE 2020
6 years ago

What else would one expect from FAKE NEWS ?!!!
comment image

Eric Thomas
Eric Thomas
6 years ago

Eli Rosenberg is a disgrace to his race.

Period.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
6 years ago
Reply to  Eric Thomas

I’m sure he had to take a number.

The Trumpet
The Trumpet
6 years ago

The NYT wants a coup against President Trump. Trump was so right in identifying the Globalist media as an enemy of the people. Its time for ALL patriots to fight these anti American scumbags with everything they have.

Retiredextremelydangerous
Retiredextremelydangerous
6 years ago
Reply to  The Trumpet

Correction: With everything “We” have! Grab a pitchfork and storm their No Go Zones!

Retiredextremelydangerous
Retiredextremelydangerous
6 years ago

Sarsour can put lipstick on, but she is still a Muslim PIG!

Joe
Joe
6 years ago

”Ms. Sarsour said she believed she became a target for far-right conservatives in the days after the Women’s March, which she said was evidence of a larger “Islamophobia industry.”

What is wrong with some people being against Islam in this context? Wherever people are being murdered and maimed in the world, it’s being done 99.9% of the time, by ”the religion of peace.” If it were being done by Hindus, Jews or Bhuddists, decent people would be outraged against them. Yes, not all of them, to give the obligatory qualifier.

Steve
Steve
6 years ago

It takes a jew christian hater like the nyt to stand up for that psycho. Its so dirty it wouldn’t even be good for toilet paper.

Michael Garfinkel
Michael Garfinkel
6 years ago

As long as the Jewish people excel in the production of Jews like Brad Lander, who asserts that Sarsour “….has been in my synagogue,” and, “She and my rabbi are friends” – then vicious Jew-haters like this Linda Sarsour creature will continue to enjoy success far in excess of their resources and talent.

Metatrona
Metatrona
6 years ago

The Arab degenerate bitch goddess of the NY Times!!! Whose vaginas does she want to remove now?

Trump Blue Me
Trump Blue Me
6 years ago

I think you need a second circumcision .

Sponsored
Geller Report
Thanks for sharing!