Students are discovered with a 12-FOOT-LONG cheat note for nuclear physics exam in Russia 

  • The 12.1-foot-long note was discovered in Russia's Voronezh State University
  • It contained the answers to 35 questions which they had been told to expect
  • Pictures of the wallpaper roll were widely shared on social media
  • It is unclear how students planned to use it without being caught 

A group of Russian students have taken cheating to a new level after a university professor discovered what is believed to be the world's biggest cheat note.

The students prepared the note on a 12.1-foot-long roll of wallpaper ahead of their nuclear physics exam.

It was discovered in the city of Voronezh in south western Russia's Voronezh Oblast region.

Pictures of the roll were posted on social media, where they quickly went viral.

The giant cheat note included detailed answers to 35 questions on nuclear physics that lecturers had warned students to expect.

Images of the 12.1-foot-long cheat note went viral after they were posted on social media in Russia
The note was uncovered by a university professor moderating exams

Images of the 12.1-foot-long cheat note went viral after they were posted on social media in Russia

However it is unclear how the students ever expected to be able to use the cheat note without being spotted by moderators in the physics faculty of Voronezh State University.

The photographs show students holding the rolled out cheat note, which they say took a week to prepare, while the professor who caught them looks on in amazement. 

The students and the professor were not named in reports.

Images were posted alongside the caption: 'The professor told us that we would never pass the exam without cheat notes. There are 35 questions on that cheat note.'

Reports from Russia suggest that cheating is widespread in university exams, and many lecturers are apparently relaxed about it.

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.