New! Sign up for our free email newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Lower systolic blood pressure reduces risk of hypertension complication

Date:
October 13, 2015
Source:
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Summary:
Lowering systolic blood pressure below the currently recommended target can reduce the risk of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), the most common complication of high blood pressure, according to new research.
Share:
FULL STORY

Lowering systolic blood pressure below the currently recommended target can reduce the risk of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), the most common complication of high blood pressure, according to new research.

The study, led by Elsayed Z. Soliman, M.D., director of the Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, is published in the early online edition of Hypertension.

LVH, the enlargement and thickening of the walls of the left ventricle, the heart's main pumping chamber, is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, stroke and even sudden cardiac death. Although doctors have known that reversal of LVH can be achieved by sustained lowering of systolic blood pressure -- the upper number on a blood pressure reading -- it wasn't known if a strategy aimed at lowering blood pressure beyond the recommended level would reduce the risk.

In this study, the researchers examined the effect of lowering systolic blood pressure to 120mmHg compared to the standard target of 140mmHg on LVH. Data from 4,331 participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Blood Pressure trial were included in the analysis. The ACCORD trial, which was sponsored by the National Heart, Blood and Lung Institute, was a randomized, multicenter trial involving middle-aged and older patients with Type 2 diabetes at risk of cardiovascular disease.

Approximately half of the study participants were randomly assigned to standard BP regimen and half were assigned to the intensive version. The baseline prevalence of LVH was similar in both groups, but after 4.4 years, the intensive-therapy group was associated with a 39 percent lower risk of LVH as compared to the standard-therapy group, according to the study authors.

"Our study provides evidence that making less than 120 the target systolic blood pressure in people with hypertension and diabetes reduces LVH," Soliman said. "Lowering blood pressure even below the standard is good for heart muscle."

This, he added, is in line with the recent report from the SPRINT trial showing that blood pressure lowering below 120 mmHg reduces cardiovascular events by almost a third, as compared to the target systolic pressure of 140 mmHg.

"Notably, only stroke risk -- not other cardiovascular events -- was reduced in the ACCORD trial, which could be due to certain risks associated with implementing both intensive blood pressure lowering and intensive blood glucose lowering in the same patient," Soliman said.


Story Source:

Materials provided by Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Elsayed Z. Soliman, Robert P. Byington, J. Thomas Bigger, Gregory Evans, Peter M. Okin, David C. Goff, Haiying Chen. Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. Hypertension, 2015; HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06236 DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06236

Cite This Page:

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. "Lower systolic blood pressure reduces risk of hypertension complication." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 13 October 2015. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151013144323.htm>.
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. (2015, October 13). Lower systolic blood pressure reduces risk of hypertension complication. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 22, 2024 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151013144323.htm
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center. "Lower systolic blood pressure reduces risk of hypertension complication." ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151013144323.htm (accessed April 22, 2024).

Explore More

from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES