BETA
This is a BETA experience. You may opt-out by clicking here

More From Forbes

Edit Story

How Zuckerberg Is Feeding His Facebook Conglomerate

This article is more than 9 years old.

It should be pretty clear to everyone now: Facebook is no longer a single social entity out to conquer the world.

“Facebook is a family of apps,” Mark Zuckerberg said at the company’s F8 developers conference on Wednesday. A further description might be conglomerate, giant squid or anything else denoting a large, multi-tentacled entity.

There’s a fundamental shift happening at Facebook. The company is funnelling more resources than ever into Messenger, pumping it up with new features that it hopes will ape the success of Asian peers like WeChat and LINE.

The goal is to morph it into a platform teeming with useful, sometimes premium services. Most of those services will host ads or cost users money, and as those business models solidify on Messenger, Zuckerberg can migrate the few that work best onto the likes of WhatsApp and Instagram.

That’s how he’ll justify the $19 billion he paid for WhatsApp in Feb. 2014, and the $1 billion he paid for Instagram in April 2012.

Over time, Zuckerberg wants Messenger to become something that looks more like an operating system than an app, hosting everything from games and entertainment, to payment services and business transactions — all on mobile.

One reason why: Messenger is simply growing faster than Facebook’s main app.

Messenger grew by 50% in 2014, while the main Facebook app was up by 23%, according to figures from market research firm GlobalWebIndex. Even when you strip out the size disadvantage Facebook’s main app has next to Messenger, the latter still saw stronger, 8.7% growth in active users over 2014, compared to the Facebook app’s 7.4%.

Messenger simply has more momentum, and globally its users numbers grew even faster than WhatsApp in 2014 - by 50% compared to WhatsApp’s 34%.

One of the most important new features announced on Wednesday, Businesses on Messenger, essentially offers companies official accounts so they can communicate directly with customers.

Facebook is billing this as an attempt to “kill junk mail,” but long term it’s another way for Facebook to make money.

Facebook isn’t charging businesses like Everlane and zulily (its first two partners) to create official business accounts on messenger right now. But it would be crazy to assume the company won’t explore ways to capitalize on corporate clients like these over time, especially since business accounts have worked so well for Asian chat apps like WeChat.

“There are more official accounts created on WeChat each day in China than there are websites brought online,” says Ted Livingston, founder and CEO of Kik.

Last year Kik also introduced official accounts for businesses, allowing them to host chat bots on the app that hold automated conversations with users - a strange but growing form of advertising.

Facebook also appears to be be using Messenger as as a testing ground for similar features that will eventually migrate to other subsidiaries like Instagram and WhatsApp.

WhatsApp’s founders have long shunned advertising as a route to making money through its 700 million active users, but the way that plays out depends on how they define advertising. It turns out WhatsApp has already said in the past that it will probably turn to commercial messages in the future to make money. That could mean chat bots like Kik's, or official accounts that take the role of call center workers.

Interestingly, Zuckerberg isn’t pushing his subsidiaries to do any of that, anytime soon.

Messenger head David Marcus, Instagram’s co-founder Mike Krieger and WhatsApp co-founder Brian Actor, all said this week that they were still operating independently, with no immediate plans to merge their services together or poach one another’s users.

Each app had different audiences that wanted different things, Kreiger explained on stage at Facebook’s F8 developers’ conference Wednesday. (Read all their comments via Forbes’ Rob Hof here.) And there were no plans for WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook Messenger to merge into one, Acton said.

Zuckerberg didn’t buy WhatsApp and Instagram to bulk up Facebook itself, but to build out what is gradually becoming a social conglomerate, one that now spans to virtual reality with last year’s purchase of Oculus Rift.

Key to making that work is allowing Facebook’s new mobile tentacles to operate as independently as possible. After all, WhatsApp’s founders only agreed to sell to Facebook because Zuck promised them autonomy.

Zuckerberg for now is keeping to his word, and has told Instagram and WhatsApp to keep doing what they’re doing. They’ll continue to focus on improving reliability and scaling up globally, building on the fact that the vast majority of WhatsApp’s users base, and 70% of Instagram’s, are located outside the United States.

WhatsApp’s role is gradually solidifying into one of a modern day communications utility to rival our current perceptions of what a phone company should be.

It offers free texting on pretty much any mobile phone you can think of, including basic phones in developing countries, and it will soon offer free voice calling too with a level of reliability that will probably put Skype to shame.

Eventually, though, the platform features that start to pervade Messenger will also find their way onto WhatsApp and Instagram.

If users become accustomed enough to them through Messenger, that should be a pretty straightforward evolution to new revenue streams. But it has to be done right on Messenger first, and that’s Zuckerberg’s challenge for the next year or two.